You Cannot be Serious FSA!!
So the British Foods Standards Agency (FSA) has deigned down upon us all their view that organic food has no health benefits over “ordinary” food. Funny how food that is produced by using chemicals and pesticides is now regarded as being “ordinary” food don’t you think?
It’s not natural, but thankfully and to much relief all round, the FSA has decreed it to be “ordinary”. Phew!
It is even more funny (peculiar, not ha ha) that when you think about it that we are therefore the only species on the Planet who are eating “ordinary” food by choice because we are the only species on the Planet who deliberately “flavour” our food with such chemicals and pesticides. (Of course many of these species now do partake of our chemical cocktail soup because they have no choice, but that’s another matter.) By the way can we extend their analogy to things like “ordinary” weapons of mass destruction and organic ones? Are “ordinary” WMDs better?
Do all those poor critters and plants know what they were missing before we came along?
Well maybe they do because other “scientific” reports indicate that about 67 million birds die each year in the USA as a direct result of the use of pesticides. But of course if the FSA say there are no health benefits in eating organic food then who am I to argue?
Or what about the fact that the average Irish person eats about 7kg worth of preservatives and additives each year, many of which are carcinogenic and certainly aren’t healthy? But no, the FSA says there are no health benefits in eating organic.
Or what about the fact that organic food has been shown to contain much higher levels of flavonoids, proteins and zinc for example than “ordinary” food. These all been proven to have positive health benefits, but these scientific reports “weren’t relevant” to the FSA report. Of course not, you’d have to be an idiot to think they would be wouldn’t you?
Saying that organic food is no healthier than “ordinary” food is also a bit like the Chinese saying opening a new coal mine every week is going to boost their economy. In fact the economic costs of doing so will far outweigh any potential benefits due to environmental degradation, pollution and massive health costs as a result.
Is the use of pesticides and chemicals any different in the long run?
Any scientific report to have credibility needs context, meaningful content and most importantly of all objectivity.
The FSA report lacks all three and therefore falls on its own sword of being – ordinary!
Do not digest it would be my advice – it could damage your health!
Tony Kearney
www.whoownsthefuture.com
07/08/09



